FULL ARTICLE:
HTTP://BLOG.SINA.COM.CN/S/BLOG_59170FB60100RGYN.HTML
PATRICK MASSON
Open educational resources, open content, open access, open
research, open courseware—all of these open initiatives share, and benefit
from, a vision of access and a collaborative framework that often result in
improved outcomes. Many of these open initiatives have gained adoption within higher
education and are now serving in mission-critical roles throughout colleges and
universities, with institutions recognizing reduced costs and/or increased
value related to access and quality. If such a social organization of
cooperation and production (i.e., openness) does indeed enhance the creation,
delivery, and management of the critical products and services required by an
institution of higher education to fulfill its mission, the next logical
question is whether open development and governance can have a broader
applicability—beyond software, resources, courses, learning objects, and
content. Can understanding the principles and practices that govern open-source
initiatives, and the communities of practice that manage them, provide a
potential reference model for institutions of higher education? Can colleges
and universities improve administrative and academic planning and
decision-making processes within institutional governance through these open
principles and practices?
Our Introduction to Openness
According to the Open Source Initiative (OSI): "The
'open source' label was invented at a strategy session held on February 3rd,
1998 in Palo Alto, California." The idea was inspired by the seminal work
"The Cathedral and the Bazaar," first presented in 1997 by Eric
Raymond, whose analysis, "centered on the idea of distributed peer review,
had an immediate and strong appeal both within and (rather unexpectedly)
outside the hacker culture."1 Originally, Raymond believed there was
"a certain critical complexity above which a more centralized, a priori
approach was required" and that the most important software "needed
to be built like cathedrals, carefully crafted by individual wizards or small
bands of mages working in splendid isolation."2
One of the earliest open-source technologies to enter the
campus portfolio was Linux, in the 1990s. As Raymond noted: "Linus
Torvalds's style of development—release early and often, delegate everything
you can, be open to the point of promiscuity—came as a surprise. No quiet,
reverent cathedral-building here—rather, the Linux community ..........
Full article:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_59170fb60100rgyn.htm
Notes
1. Open Source Initiative, "History of the OSI,"
<http://www.opensource.org/history>.
2. Eric S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on
Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary(Sebastopol, Calif.:
O'Reilly Media, 1999), p. 21.
3. Ibid., pp. 21–22.
4. Donna Scott and George J. Weiss, "Linux Marches
toward Mainstream Adoption," Gartner Research, November 11, 2003,
<http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_search&id=414985>.
5. "Tech Budgets Get Some Relief; Cautious Support for
Open Source Applications,"
2004 Campus Computing Survey,
<http://www.campuscomputing.net/2004-campus-computing-survey>.
6. Rob Abel, "Open Source Quick Survey Results,"
May 3, 2005, <http://www.a-hec.org/research/surveys/osqp0505.html>.
7. Lois Brooks, "Considering Open Source: A Framework
for Evaluating Software in the New Economy," EDUCAUSE Center for Applied
Research (ECAR) Research Bulletin, January 2, 2007, pp. 2–3,
<http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0701.pdf>.
8. Ibid., pp. 9, 6.
9. Rob Abel, "Best Practices in Open Source in Higher
Education Study: The State of Open Source Software," March 1, 2006,
<http://www.a-hec.org/open_source_state.html>
<http://www.a-hec.org/media/files/A-HEC open source hed 030106.pdf>.
Quotes from "Open to Open Source," Inside Higher Ed, March 1, 2006,
<http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/03/01/open>.
10. Archives of the American Scientist Open Access Forum,
<http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html>;
David Wiley, "Defining 'Open,'" Iterating toward Openness, November
16, 2009, <http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1123#axzz0qwFEmait>;
"Learn for Free Online," BBC News, September 22, 2002,
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2270648.stm>; UNESCO, "Forum
on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries:
Final Report" (Paris, July 1–3, 2002),
<http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf>; Susannah Fox,
"Open Research Since 2000," Pew Internet & American Life Project,
April 27, 2010, <http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2010/April/Open-Research-Since-2000.aspx>.
See also Amit Deshpande and Dirk Riehle, "The Total Growth of Open
Source," Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS
2008) (New York: Springer Verlag, 2008), pp. 197–209,
<http://dirkriehle.com/publications/2008/the-total-growth-of-open-source/>.
11. "Wireless Networks Reach Half of College
Classrooms; IT Security Incidents Decline This Past Year," 2006 Campus
Computing Survey, <http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2006/index.html>.
12. "IT Budgets Are Down--Again!," 2009 Campus
Computing
Survey,<http://www.campuscomputing.net/sites/www.campuscomputing.net/files/CampusComputing2009_2.pdf>.
13. "uPortal Steering Committee," Jasig website,
<http://www.jasig.org/uportal/steering-committee>.
14. "Leadership," Liferay website,
<http://www.liferay.com/about-us/leadership>.
15. Colin Currie, "What Is Openness, Anyway?," EQ,
vol. 32, no. 1 (2009),
<http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/WhatIsOpennessAnyway/163862>.
16. "EDUCAUSE Values: Openness," EDUCAUSE Review,
vol. 44, no. 1 (January/February 2009),
<http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/EDUCAUSEValuesOpenness/163568>.
17. In addition to the Internet as a platform for
production, new development processes—collectively known as agile software
development—have emerged in commercial environments such as Blackboard, RedHat,
Sungard, and Oracle, as well as in open-source projects such as Moodle and
Sakai, promising greater responsiveness to users.
18. "Category:Governance," P2P Foundation Wiki,
<http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Governance>.
19. Brad Wheeler, "Open Source 2010: Reflections on
2007," EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 42, no. 1 (January/February 2007),
<http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume42/OpenSource2010Reflectionson200/158109>
1 comment:
Interesting thoughts I really enjoyed your blog.
Post a Comment